READ MORE:
* Oliver Hartwich: The West is back
* Give progress a chance: Embrace degrowth

When Q + A’s Jack Tame asked Marin about the secret to Finland’s success, she pointed to a cross-party commitment to increasing research and development (R&D) expenditures. Finland has a goal, shared by all parties, to raise their R&D investments to 4 percent of GDP by 2030. Finland’s current expenditure on R&D is about 3 percent of GDP, while New Zealand’s is 1.4 percent.

Finland and New Zealand’s export profiles are also very different, with Finland’s heavily weighted toward electronics and manufactured products, while primary industries dominate New Zealand’s.

With an election in October, it is a good time to think about New Zealand’s policy settings and what we can learn from the success of Finland and other small innovative countries. Where should we invest to increase innovation and boost New Zealand’s economic and social wellbeing?

The Global Innovation Index benchmarks countries on 81 measures, grouped into seven dimensions that underpin national innovativeness. Finland ranks well above New Zealand in all categories except our institutional environment.

There is one item where New Zealand excels that we might not want to be known for – a low cost of redundancy dismissal. We are first in the world for having low costs of dismissing employees, while Finland ranks 30th.  

Compared with Finland, New Zealand’s biggest weaknesses are a lack of business sophistication, challenges turning inputs into knowledge and technology outputs, and weak infrastructure. On several measures, New Zealand is significantly outside the range for high-income countries and is more similar to developing economies. These measures include education, capital formation, and low labour productivity growth.  

With so much to do, it isn’t easy to know where to start. Education seems a good bet, as a well-educated population arguably underpins many other measures. New Zealand has low funding per student and a high student-teacher ratio at the secondary level. But these are not relative strengths for Finland either, and their funding per pupil ranks lower than New Zealand’s. Similarly, Finland isn’t a star performer when it comes to capital formation or labour productivity.

The starkest differences between New Zealand and Finland trace back to those R&D figures and the processes that transform R&D investment into economically valuable outputs. Finland invests more and delivers more innovation outputs than expected, given the global average, whereas New Zealand delivers fewer. Finland does this through exceptional innovation linkages, including university-industry collaboration, the development of industry clusters, and international research collaboration and funding.

A potential bright spot, New Zealand has a high rate of new business formation, ranking fifth in the world compared with Finland’s 26th. However, this hasn’t yet translated into a more diversified economy, including high-tech manufacturing or export growth, for which Finland ranks highly. Relatively low scores for knowledge diffusion, ICT adoption, growth capital, knowledge workers’ availability, and science and engineering graduates may explain this.

Finland’s example suggests whichever party leads New Zealand’s next government, innovation should be at the top of their agenda – not just increasing R&D expenditures but ensuring the processes that underpin our national innovation system function well.   

The potential benefits of increasing our innovativeness are huge. Finland’s GDP per capita is 16 percent higher than New Zealand’s, and Switzerland’s is a whopping 70 percent higher. Matching Finland would add another US$35 billion annually to our economy. The government’s share would help fund much-needed improvements in healthcare, education, and other public goods essential to Kiwis’ wellbeing.